The General Gist of False Memories
Duke University neuroscientists have found a distinction between memories for specifics versus memories for the overall gist of an event. The latter, the overall impression we have of something, tends to be the memory that is more often false.
SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Mind
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Which do you trust more? A memory of a dinner party where you specifically recall sitting next to your pal Jake? Or a memory that it was just a fun time?
Duke University neuroscientists say that we’d trust both memories, a lot…even though the general impression type memories are more often false.
Researchers tested the memories of subjects using brain imaging through fMRI. They found that when subjects had high confidence in memories that were true, there was increased activity in their medial temporal lobe, at the base of the brain – the area that processes details of an event.
But when subjects had high confidence in memories for things that had never happened, they showed more activity in the frontal parietal network, at the top of the brain. An area that processes the overall feeling of an event.
As we age we tend to lose the ability to recall specifics but we do remember general impressions, however these are the ones that are often false…hm, how unfortunate.
Alzheimer’s patients tend to be different however, they lose both kinds of memories equally – this might be a useful tool for early diagnosis, the Duke researchers say.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
