Familiarity Can Breed Confusion In Communicating

A study finds that close friends, co-workers or family members can have trouble understanding each other because they develop communications shorthand that can sometimes derail meaning.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Steve Mirsky: Hello, Karen Hopkin, frequent contributor to the daily Scientific American podcast.
Karen Hopkin: Hello.  Hey, did ya hear that thing about miscommunication?
SM: Miss Who?
KH: No, not Miss Who.  What. 
SM: Watt?  James Watt, inventor of the improved steam engine in 1765? It was in all the papers.
KH: No.  What’s on second. Who’s on first.  I don’t know’s on third. But never mind that.  There was a big study on how people have trouble communicating.   SM: Not sure I follow you. 
KH: Okay.  So a psychologist at the University of Chicago found that sharing new information, or trying to share new information, can slow down communication, especially when the people doing the sharing know each other well.
SM: Know each other well what?
KH: What’s still on second.  Turns out that people who live together, or work together, assume that the other person already knows what they’re talking about, so they tend to use shorthand. Which often just confuses the heck out of everyone involved.
SM: Interesting.
KH: Yah, familiarity breeds con…fusion.
SM: You mean familiarity breeds contempt.
KH: Yeah.  That too. 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe