Tour de France Cyclists Need To Pig Out

To complete the 2200 miles of the world's most famous cycling race, riders need to consume the caloric equivalent of 25 cheeseburgers each day. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



The Tour de France ended Sunday with 24 year old Spaniard Alberto Contador taking home the yellow jersey.  The doping scandals tarred the race, which is a shame, because what clean riders do is superhuman.  They cover, and quickly, 2200 miles in 20 days.  Contador spent 90 hours in the saddle during the race—the other 140 cyclists who finished spent even more time riding.

And according to researchers at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, the riders needed more than 20 million calories to complete the course.  To put that in perspective, 20 million calories is what’s in about 72,000 cheeseburgers.   That works out to about 25 cheeseburgers per rider per day.

When they’re on the road, each Tour rider generates somewhere between 250 and 350 watts.  How much is that?  If all that power could be captured, the one million people lining the course every day to watch the peleton speed by could probably run all their iPods and radios off the cyclist output.  Plus have enough left over to cook up a cheeseburger of their own.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe