Nectar-Feeding Bats Really Burn Energy
Nectar-feeding bats, which have to hover, go through sugar three times faster than even world-class athletes. Steve Mirsky reports.
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
On the August 2nd episode, we talked about the amazingly high caloric needs of the cyclists competing in the Tour de France. Now comes a study about a group of animal athletes that burn sugar three times faster than even world-class cyclists. They’re nectar-feeding bats, and they go through their fuel faster than any other mammal on earth, according to researchers reporting in the journal Functional Ecology. The bats hover and that kind of flight really burns energy.
The scientists fed long-tongued bats—they need the long tongues to get at the nectar in the flowers—they fed the bats sugar labeled with radioactive carbon and then measured the carbon that the bats exhaled. They found that bats burned the sugars they ingested within minutes. After less than a half hour they were fueling all of their metabolism with the new sugar. The highest rates in humans are in athletes who can fuel about a third of their metabolisms from recently sucked down power drinks.
Most mammals store energy and then access it, but the bat lifestyle required them to develop a just-in-time sugar delivery system.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
