New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Nectar-Feeding Bats Really Burn Energy

Nectar-feeding bats, which have to hover, go through sugar three times faster than even world-class athletes. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



On the August 2nd episode, we talked about the amazingly high caloric needs of the cyclists competing in the Tour de France.  Now comes a study about a group of animal athletes that burn sugar three times faster than even world-class cyclists.  They’re nectar-feeding bats, and they go through their fuel faster than any other mammal on earth, according to researchers reporting in the journal Functional Ecology.  The bats hover and that kind of flight really burns energy.

The scientists fed long-tongued bats—they need the long tongues to get at the nectar in the flowers—they fed the bats sugar labeled with radioactive carbon and then measured the carbon that the bats exhaled.  They found that bats burned the sugars they ingested within minutes.  After less than a half hour they were fueling all of their metabolism with the new sugar.  The highest rates in humans are in athletes who can fuel about a third of their metabolisms from recently sucked down power drinks.  

Most mammals store energy and then access it, but the bat lifestyle required them to develop a just-in-time sugar delivery system.  

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe