Computer Takes Clarinet Lessons

Detailed analysis of how a clarinetist plays the instrument is a first step toward incredibly natural sounding synthesizer music. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Podcast Transcript: Benny Goodman earned his title “The King of Swing” as a virtuoso of the clarinet.  But now a computer in upstate New York has learned to rip him off. Researchers at the University of Rochester recently unveiled their computerized clarinet, which you’re hearing.  It listens to a clarinet solo and figures out how hard the player was blowing, his lip pressure on the mouthpiece and his finger position. The virtual clarinet player uses this information to reproduce the solo on its virtual clarinet, a synthesizer based on the physics of the clarinet.
 
To design this synthesizer, the team played a real clarinet while measuring physical changes like the reed’s vibration and the pressure of the air column inside. They modeled these measurements with equations to create the virtual clarinet. An audio file of the solo reproduced by the virtual player is 1000 times smaller than the original as an mp3.  But it still doesn’t sound as good as Benny. The simulation doesn’t swing as well as the king would have.  But future music could come from various synthetic instruments, modeled on performances of the masters.

—Christopher Intagliata 60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe