35 Years of Renewable Energy

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory has been working for 35 years to make solar power and other technologies a reality. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On July 5, 1977, a group of scientists and engineers opened the Solar Energy Research Institute in the Colorado foothills of the Rocky Mountains. By 1980, the outfit had a budget of $100 million dedicated to research and development of photovoltaics and solar thermal power. They also strove to educate the public about solar power and energy efficiency.

Such sunny dreams faded during the Reagan administration but the scientific outfit rebounded in the early 1990s, now called the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Its mandate expanded to everything from algae-based biofuels to harnessing the thermal energy in hot rocks.

Now NREL is turning 35, and such sources remain a small fraction of the U.S. energy supply, despite precipitous drops in the cost of renewable technologies like wind and solar. More than 80 percent of U.S. energy still comes from burning coal, oil and, more and more, natural gas.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In addition, recent government efforts to boost the future of solar manufacturing in the U.S. have ended in bankruptcy, from Solyndra to, more recently, Abound Solar. So there’s plenty more work to be done to make renewable energy a reality. To avoid catastrophic climate change, let's hope it doesn't take another 35 years.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe