Wrists Insist Hobbit Is Different Species
An analysis of the wrist bones of the Indonesian fossil known as "the hobbit" points to separate species status, rather than arming those who believe that the tiny human was a diseased Homo sapiens. Cynthia Graber reports.
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
A few years ago scientists discovered a three-foot skeleton of an early human species on an Indonesian island. They nicknamed the creature a “hobbit.” But the find left scientists with two major questions: Do these short, 18,000-year-old bones represent an entirely new human species? Or is it just someone with a growth disorder? Now the wrist bones may provide an answer. Researchers from the Smithsonian Institution published an article in the latest issue of Science. They showed that the hobbit’s wrists are significantly different from both early humans and from Neanderthals. In fact, the wrists are closer to those of African apes. Wrist bones take shape in early pregnancy and don’t change much. They’re also particularly distinctive between species. Scientists believe this shows that an early species in the human line migrated from Africa to Asia. They evolved into a new species on the Indonesian island. If modern humans and Neanderthals have a common ancestor, then modern humans and hobbits have a common, well, grand-ancestor. Making us and hobbits kind of second cousins.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
