Super NOVA: The Dover Scopes Trial
The latest episode of NOVA is a two-hour examination of the 2005 Dover, PA, intelligent design-evolution trial. Steve Mirsky reports. See pbs.org/nova/id
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
In September 2005 I attended the beginning of the now famous Dover, Pennsylvania, evolution vs. intelligent design trial. I was present for opening arguments by both sides. And I also was in the courtroom for the testimony of expert witness Ken Miller, a well-known evolutionary biologist and author from Brown University. Throw out your TV-drama influenced notions of the assured-lawyer-with-nervous-witness interaction. Miller easily parried every attack by the lawyer for the intelligent design side.
On November 13, the PBS TV program NOVA debuted a two-hour episode devoted to the Dover trial. It included re-enactments of some of the most compelling sections of the actual courtroom testimony, including some of Ken Miller’s. And the segment in which witnesses clearly show the evolution of the intelligent design textbook from its creationist origins is ironically delicious. The NOVA show is repeated numerous times this week. It’ll also be available in its entirety at pbs.org/nova/id starting November 16th.
—Steve Mirsky
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
