Pluto Was Never As Planetary As Eris
New studies show that the dwarf planet Eris is actually bigger than Pluto, which was recently demoted from full planet down to dwarf planet status. David Biello reports.
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
It’s been a tough year for Pluto. Last summer, astronomers demoted the icy sphere to dwarf planet status. Now the dwarf planet formerly known as Xena has displaced Pluto as the largest such object known. That’s according to a report in the journal Science. Named after Eris, the goddess of strife, the icy usurper proved to be 27 percent more massive than Pluto when examined by astronomer Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology, who also discovered Eris. He used the Hubble Space Telescope and Keck Observatory as well as the orbital period of Eris's moon Dysnomia to determine the density of what is now the queen of the dwarf planets. She weighs in at 16.6 billion trillion kilograms and has a girth of 2,400 kilometers--making her the pudgier of the two dwarves. Pluto doesn't even have the most eccentric orbit in the Kuiper Belt anymore. But at least Pluto will always have the 76 glorious years it was officially classified as the ninth planet. With Pluto out, the planetary mnemonic I learned as a child has been changed to: My Very Excellent Mother Just Sent Us…Nothing.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
