Study Finds Diet Indeed Affects Acne

Young men with moderate acne saw their condition improve after following a low-glycemic diet. Cynthia Graber reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


September 26, 2007 -- Study Finds Diet Indeed Influences Acne

For decades, dermatologists have said there’s not connection between diet and acne. But many patients have insisted they do see a link.  Slowly, information has been accumulating that shows the acne sufferers might be right. The latest study was recently published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Australian researchers split 54 young men with moderate acne into two groups. Half followed a typical Western diet, full of sugar and refined flour, that’s known as a high-glycemic diet. The other half ate a low-glycemic diet: whole grains, fruits and vegetables, fish and lean meat. After three months, those on the low-glycemic diet had significantly fewer bright red bumps.

Researchers say it’s a complex connection. Sugar and white flour lead to insulin spikes. We know that insulin spikes affect levels of different hormones, and that hormones affect the development of acne. This hormonal link might be enough to convince any teenager, but scientists say the diet-acne connection needs further research. Still, it’s one study in favor of diet influencing acne and another against the typical American diet.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe