Clotbusting Drug Looks Promising For Frostbite Victims

Small blood clots that form during warming therapy can cause frostbite sufferers to lose digits. But in a small study, the clotbusting drug tPA greatly lowered the amputation rate. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Frostbite treatment hasn’t changed much in the last 25 years.  The basic therapy is to rewarm the frozen tissue, wait and hope you don’t have to amputate.  Which you often do have to do.  In fact, an axiom among doctors is “Frostbite in January, amputate in July.” But a small study just published in the Archives of Surgery suggests something new might be on the horizon for frostbite victims.  Researchers theorized that a medication used to dissolve blood clots might be effective in frostbite.  It’s called tissue plasminogen activator, or tPA. 

One of the big problems in frostbite therapy is inflammation during thawing.  The inflammation stimulates clotting that blocks small blood vessels, causing cell death.  The tPA apparently keeps clots from forming, sparing the cells.  In the study, six frostbite victims received tPA within 24 hours of suffering their freezing injuries, while 25 others got traditional treatment.  That latter group, treated conventionally, lost 41 percent of their affected fingers and toes.  But the tPA-treated patients wound up losing just 10 percent of their frostbitten digits.  Future studies should help standardize the timing and duration of clotbusting drug administration.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe