Nuclear Energy's Next Generation

A new generation of reactors after more than 30 years without a new nuclear plant raises hopes, opportunities and concerns. David Biello reports. See tinyurl.com/2pb4bc

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



(Audio of alarms going off.)  It's only a drill at a nuclear reactor. Such simulations train operators to prevent meltdowns. Such constant training has ensured no repeat of the near disaster at Three Mile Island. But real problems still happen several times a month at the 104 nuclear reactors in the U.S. And with plans to build as many as 29 new reactors, that sound may become ever more common. A nuclear renaissance is under way in the U.S. and abroad as governments look for reliable, secure and climate-friendly means of generating electricity. Reliable in that nuclear reactors can generate electricity nearly 90 percent of the time. Secure in that such power plants rely on fuel found in Australia, Canada and the U.S. And climate-friendly in that generating electricity from uranium produces less greenhouse gases than burning fossil fuels. But questions remain, including what to do with the waste. In addition to being radioactive, it contains materials suitable for nuclear weapons. It remains to be seen whether nuclear is a bright--some might say glowing—hope or a false alarm. For more on the new nuclear energy, check out www.sciam.com this week. (See www.tinyurl.com/2pb4bc)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe