Craving for Sex May Trip Other Hungers in Men

Watching women in bikinis tends to make men more impulsive when it comes to monetary decisions. Christie Nicholson reports.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[Below is the original script. Some textual variations may have been made during the recording of this podcast.]

 

Sex is back—with the movie Sex and the City opening this week in New York City to record-breaking crowds.

So, what better time to look at an interesting effect of sexual images.

Men who watch a video of bikini-clad women or fondle lingerie are apt to be more impatient to receive other rewarding stimuli, like money, candy or even soda—according to research published last week in the Journal of Consumer Behavior.

Three studies included a total of 348 men, from 17 to 39 years.

After seeing pics or videos of sexy women or handling a bra, men consistently preferred immediate gratification: They chose to receive a small sum of money right away, over receiving a large sum later.

Previous studies show that erotic stimuli tap into the same brain circuits as money and drug rewards do. This research further supports the idea that one stimuli, sexy images, can leak into a craving for different stimuli, like money—at least in half the human race.

No similar effects reported for women…yet.

I mean Sex and the City's Samantha starts stuffing her face with guacamole after ogling a sexy male neighbor in the shower.

Then again, Samantha is considered the most masculine of the four female characters….


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

60-Second Psych is a weekly podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe