New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Boxing Batters Brain Even With Headgear

Amateur boxers, wearing headgear, still suffered insult to the brain in some cases equivalent to a small stroke.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Becoming punch drunk is not just a risk for professional boxers.  There’s a risk of brain damage for the amateurs too, despite their use of head protection.  That’s according to research being presented today at the American Academy of Neurology meeting in Boston. 

Doctors from the Sahlgrenska Hospital in Sweden performed spinal taps on boxers within 10 days of a fight.  They found that their cerebrospinal fluid had four times the level of a protein called neurofilament light—which is associated with nerve damage—compared with levels found in non-athletes.  Some boxers who took more than 15 hits to their head in one bout had brain damage equivalent to that of a minor stroke.  Even wearing head gear, boxers’ brains smack against the skull with each blow, stretching blood vessels and damaging cells.  Some good news though: the levels of markers for cell damage returned to normal after a three month hiatus from boxing.  Dr. James Kelly, a brain injury expert at the University of Colorado said there might be the hope for some recovery for partially injured cells.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe