New York City's Big Smoking Decline
Between 2002 and 2006, New York City's rate of smokers went down by 20 percent. Analysts credit tobacco taxes, workplace smoking prohibitions and a major ad campaign. Steve Mirsky reports. For more info, go to www.cdc.gov/mmwr
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
You know there’s a zillion reasons not to smoke. Here’s one more. A new study in the Journal of Orthopaedic Research found that smoking interferes with ligament healing after injury. Anyway, one place where people apparently are getting the no smoking message is New York City. Between 2002 and 2006, the city saw its smoking rate go down by 20 percent. That’s about a quarter million fewer smoking New Yorkers. That left only 17.5 percent of the city still smoking, which is a lower rate than 45 states have.
All these figures appear in an article in the newest issue of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Morbidity and Mortality Report. It’s available online at www.cdc.gov/mmwr/.
What prompted the decline? After a decade-long lack of progress, in 2002 the city increased the tobacco tax, prohibited smoking in most workplaces and launched a major ad campaign. Although the Bronx, Manhattan and Queens have all seen more than a 20 percent drop in smoking, Staten Island’s rate remained virtually unchanged. Well, a lot of people think Staten Island should really be part of New Jersey.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
