New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

5 Rocky Planets Found in Ancient, Distant Solar System

The oldest group of terrestrial worlds now known formed some 11.2 billion years ago, more than six billion years before our sun and planets. Clara Moskowitz reports

 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Like Dr. Evil in the Austin Powers movies, our solar system appears to have its own mini-me. Astronomers have discovered that the sunlike star Kepler 444 has five rocky planets orbiting it that range from about Mercury’s size to that of Venus. The planets are bunched in close to their star, making it a miniature version of our solar system—and one that’s much, much older. The finding is in The Astrophysical Journal. [T. L. Campante et al, An Ancient Extrasolar System with Five Sub-Earth-size Planets]
 
Kepler 444 and its planets formed some 11.2 billion years ago, when the universe was less than one fifth its current age. That date makes this system the oldest group of terrestrial worlds known.
 
The discovery tells scientists that rocky, Earth-like planets were forming very early in the history of the universe, and under conditions quite different than when the sun and its planets were born just 4.6 billion years ago.
 
Astronomers detected the planets using the Kepler telescope, which measures the slight dimming of a star’s light caused by orbiting planets passing in front of it. A second technique called asteroseismology—the measurement of tiny oscillations in the star’s brightness—revealed Kepler 444’s size, mass and impressive age, which researchers say provides billions of more years for ancient extraterrestrial life to have taken hold somewhere out there.
 
—Clara Moskowitz
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe