Kids and Adults Share Nightmares

Children who are more "difficult" and who have more behavior issues also have more nightmares. Which makes them like adults, who also express emotional issues as bad dreams. Cynthia Graber reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


How frequent are nightmares for toddlers, and what causes them? Those are questions researchers at the University of Montreal hoped to answer. They asked parents of about a thousand children to estimate the occurrence of their child’s nightmares from age two and a half through age six. The parents were also questioned about their child’s disposition.

First, it turns out nightmares aren’t so frequent. About a third of the parents reported no nightmares at all. And then there’s the second result. Kids who were called “difficult” as early as 5 months were more likely to suffer from nightmares as toddlers. And the ones who at a year and a half were more anxious, more likely to cry, and more difficult to calm down were also more likely to have bad dreams.

The study authors say this means children may be, well, like little adults.  It’s already well established that adults tend to express real-live stress and emotional problems as nightmares. The researchers suggest that focusing on the kids’ day-time issues, and on parenting techniques, may help banish night-time demons.
—Cynthia Graber

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe