Using Cell Phones to Track Humans

Because you can't sedate humans and attach radio collars, scientists are studying human movements with cell phone records that reveal locations. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Generic Naturalist: Biologists traditionally track migrations by tagging animals with devices that allow their movements to be monitored. But Homo sapiens can’t be fitted with radio collars. At least not without making them feel self-conscious and absurd.

Hopkin: It’s not exactly Big Brother, but if you have a cell phone, scientists in Boston may be watching you. Or at least using your cell phone records to see where you go. Because people carry and use their phones every day, they provide a great way for researchers to get a handle on human migration. The Boston scientists looked at records from 100,000 cell phone users over a six-month period, determining individuals’ positions based on which transmission towers handled their calls. They found that people are truly creatures of habit: they tend to make regular trips to the same few locations, like work, home or the local pizza place. The results appear in the June 5th issue of the journal Nature. Getting a good fix on people’s comings and goings could help predict traffic patterns or even prevent epidemics. 

Naturalist: Those same phone records show that Ray’s Famous Original Pizza is clearly the human’s first choice.

—Karen Hopkin

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe