Cockroaches Smarter At Dusk Than Dawn

For reasons still mysterious, cockroaches have an inability to learn in the morning, but can learn well in the evening. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



“Gregor Samsa awoke one morning to find that he had been turned into a giant cockroach.”  And a moron.  Franz Kafka couldn’t have known about the moron part because it was just discovered by scientists at Vanderbilt University.  They found that a roach’s ability to learn varies widely over the day.  That’s right—a cockroach is a genius in the evening, but a dolt at daybreak.  The researchers published their finding in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Test cockroaches were taught to get over their hatred for peppermint, by associating it with sugar water, which they really like.  Insects trained in the evening retained their memory of the new sugar water-peppermint association for several days.  But early-to-rise roaches were incapable of learning anything.  Why would an animal be so dumb in the morning?  Said one researcher, “We have no idea.”  Anyway, the discovery that roach memory is so strongly related to its circadian clock could open up new chances to learn more about how memory and biological clocks work together at the molecular level, as well as about learning in general.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe