ICU Paradox: Death Gets Better Grades
Families of patients who die in a hospital's Intensive Care Unit tend to be more satisfied with the level of care than the families of ICU survivors. Karen Hopkin reports.
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Having a loved one in the hospital, especially the Intensive Care Unit, or ICU, can be a harrowing experience. And it’s even more traumatic for the families of those who pass away. Or so you’d think.
But according to a study published in the November issue of the journal Chest, families whose loved ones die in the ICU tend to be more satisfied with the care they received than those whose loved ones survive.
Although the results seem paradoxical, when you look more closely at how people define “quality of care,” they do make sense. All patients who wind up in the ICU, whether or not they walk out, receive a similar standard of care from a strictly medical point of view. But doctors, nurses, and other hospital staff may devote extra time and attention to the needs of families whose loved ones are near the end.
That compassion is what families who lose a loved one are responding to when they report a more satisfactory ICU experience. Just having someone who’ll explain what’s going on, answer their questions and offer emotional support makes all the difference. An observation that, in the end, is maybe not so surprising.
—Karen Hopkin
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
