No Fair! My Serotonin Level Is Low

The chemical messenger serotonin, thought to be implicated in depression and anxiety, may change the way we see fairness in social situations. Christie Nicholson reports.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[Below is the original script. Some textual variations may have been made during the recording of this podcast.]

Serotonin is a chemical messenger thought to modulate depression, anger, sleep, sexuality...even vomiting. (Eighty percent of the body's serotonin is found in the gut.) But a recent paper in Science suggests a causal link between serotonin levels and how one perceives fairness.

Researchers depleted serotonin in subjects—via fasting and amino acid loading—then asked them to participate in an ultimatum game.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In it, a proposal is made to the subject to unevenly split a sum of money. If the subject accepts, both parties get paid; if the proposition is rejected, both walk away with nothing.

Typically, people reject lowball offers of 20 to 30 percent of the total sum—but those with depleted serotonin turned down amounts as high as 80 percent of the total. Researchers note that their moods did not change—only their behavior—meaning their perception of "fairness" became severely skewed.

Serotonin is implicated in so many emotions that it's difficult to pin down its global role in the brain, says Molly Crockett the lead author, "So it's exciting when we can see a specific behavior affected by serotonin."

This research might shed light on the possible role of serotonin in the perceived "unfairness" and anger we often see accompanying depression.

-- Christie Nicholson

60-Second Psych is a weekly podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe