Warm Crust Makes For Good Toast and Dry Land

Computer simulations reveal that the Earth's crust must stay really warm to keep most of North America above water. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Global warming is bad. But a warm globe is good—at least if you live in North America. Because researchers from the University of Utah have shown that if the Earth’s crust weren’t so toasty, most of North America would be undersea.  Most people think that mountains are made by the movement of tectonic plates…those massive slabs of land that drift across the earth’s surface. Well, that’s partly true. Tectonic forces do build mountains. But those forces, say the Utah scientists, act in part by changing the temperature of the rocks they move. Hot rocks are less dense—and more buoyant. And the more buoyant you are, the higher you float.

The scientists used a computer program to chill the North American crust to about 750 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s the temperature of the coldest crustal rock in the continent, which covers half of Canada. Without the heat, they found, North America sank: New York City dropped a quarter mile into the Atlantic ocean. Dallas, Chicago, Las Vegas…all blub blub blub.  Interestingly, cooling the crust caused Seattle to soar to an elevation of nearly 6000 feet. Those of you looking for the high ground might check out real estate in the Puget sound.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe