New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Lasers Let Lightning Loose

Researchers have used powerful lasers to induce lightning in thunderclouds. Cynthia Graber reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Podcast Transcript: Ben Franklin started it, and it’s hotter than ever: research on lightning. For the first time, a team of European scientists have used lasers to create electrical activity in thunderclouds. They published in Optics Express. Man-made lightning strikes help with a variety of research efforts—including uncovering the mechanisms of lightening, and finding the sensitivity of airplanes and power lines. Current methods of creating lightning are expensive and only work about half the time. Lasers could provide a more reliable and cost-effective method.
 
Working atop a New Mexico mountain, scientists shot pulsed lasers into passing thunderclouds. This technique had been suggested 30 years ago, but lasers then weren’t strong enough to trigger any response. The new generation of lasers create plasma filaments, or ionized channels of molecules that act like wires. Researchers tested the electrical activity at the sites where they’d aimed the lasers, and they found that there was in fact an electrical discharge. But the channels didn’t last long enough to bring a lightening strike to earth. So the team is now working to build stronger and more targeted laser bursts to create home-made lightning.

—Cynthia Graber

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe