How the Brain Hears Over Din

Research begins to unravel the cocktail party effect, in which you can somehow follow individual lines of conservation that you concentrate on, despite loud competing sounds. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

At a crowded party, it seems like it would be hard to hear the person you’re talking to over all the clinking glasses, the chatter and laughter. But somehow, your brain filters out all the noise. Scientists have known about this useful ability for over 50 years—it’s called the cocktail party effect. But they’re still trying to figure out how the brain does it. A new study in the journal Public Library of Science Biology hints at an answer.

Neuroscientists played one repeating tone to volunteers, along with a bunch of louder, distracting tones of different pitches. The participants pressed a button if they heard the right tone. Meanwhile, the researchers were monitoring the subjects’ brain activity. Turns out even when the subjects didn’t think they could detect the repeating tone, it still traveled from the inner ear to the auditory cortex. Somewhere after that initial processing, though, it got discarded before the person was consciously aware of it. So all those other conversations at a party probably likewise make it into your brain. But they get thrown away before you’re aware of them. Unless of course, you’re eavesdropping.

—Christopher Intagliata

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe