Pavement Changes Weeds Seeds

The urban environment can influence the type of seeds a plant produces, increasing the chance for the seed to land in soil. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For worse or for better, humans are changing the course of evolution. On February 26, we talked about how fishing practices may be driving the evolution of smaller, harder-to-catch trout. This week brings news that urbanization has changed the way weeds make seeds. The results appear in the current online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Scientists in the South of France were studying the sort of weed you see cropping up around the base of trees planted along city sidewalks. The weed, called Crepis sancta, can make two different kinds of seed: one that’s light like a dandelion seed with a feathery little parachute that gets carried by the wind; and another that’s heavy and just drops to the ground.
 
The scientists compared weeds that were growing in these small urban patches to ones growing in an open field. They found that the urban weeds produced fewer of the fluffy seeds than their country cousins, which makes evolutionary sense because in a city setting, drifting seeds are more likely to hit pavement than soil. In the long run, though, that strategy might not be healthy.  Because plants benefit from spreading their seeds.  So that’s bad news for the weeds.  But maybe not so bad news for the sidewalks.

—Karen Hopkin

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe