February 2, 2007

Groundhog Day Really About Whether He'll Find Mate

When Punxsutawney Phil sticks his head out on February 2, he's less interested in meteorology than in matrimony.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

February 2, 2007 -- Groundhog Day Really About Whether He’ll Find Mate

According to legend and virtually every TV station in the country, today groundhogs stick their furry little heads out of the cold winter ground, and look around to see if winter is over. But wait - a couple of years ago a Penn State researcher took the radical step of observing the groundhogs to see what’s really on their minds when they peruse their surroundings this day. The researcher studied 32 of the chunky rodents, and found out that the first groundhogs to pop up after a roughly four-month hibernation are all males. And they're not checking the weather. No, they're looking for female groundhogs, in sort of an exercise in speed dating. Remember, it's usually really cold in Pennsylvania in February. So the male critters mark territory, go on a few quick trial dates - and then go back to sleep for another month. Hey, in freezing temperatures, you woodchuck being awake too. Weeks later, the groundhogs wake up when it warms up, reconnect with their February valentines, start little groundhog families, and live Happily Ever After. Just like in the movies. (Clip from movie Groundhog Day: “Okay, campers, rise and shine, and don’t don’t forget your booties, ‘cause it’s cold out there today!”)

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American