This Is Your Brain On Arts

A three-year, multi-institutional study finds that early training in performing arts is really good for the brain. Steve Mirsky reports. For more info, go to www.dana.org

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Are smarter people drawn to music, theater and dance? Or does arts training in childhood change the brain in positive ways?  In 2004, the philanthropic Dana Foundation created a consortium of neuroscientists from seven universities to address those questions.  On March 4, the group released a report, Learning, Arts, and the Brain, available at dana.org. Some of the findings:
 
An interest in performing arts helps develop sustained attention spans, which can improve other areas of cognition.  Links exist between training in music and the ability to manipulate information in both short-term and long-term memory.  Music training also appears to improve kids’ capacity for geometric representation, as well as the acquisition of reading skills.  Acting classes lead to improved memory, via better language skills.  Dance learning is done through observation and mimicry, and that training appears to improve other cognitive skills.  So science says that dance, theater and music can make life full of sound and glory, signifying something.

—Steve Mirsky

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe