Online Game Offers Insights Into Epidemics

A glitch in the World of Warcraft online role-playing game enabled a virtual disease to spread among the characters, which became useful for real epidemiologists to study. Kevin Begos reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Online Game Offers Insights Into Epidemics--August 21, 2007 

The epidemic swept the world.  Fortunately, it was only the World of Warcraft, a popular online role-playing game.  But that got gotten the attention of real disease experts at Tufts and Rutgers Universities.  That’s because the accidental outbreak that attacked the virtual characters offered a unique opportunity to study how social groups can help spread a disease.

In late 2005 the epidemic hit the World of Warcraft, played by millions.  It all started with an error. One creature was supposed to infect only a few virtual players with so-called corrupted blood.  But some of the nastiest virtual inhabitants exploited a flaw and spread the disease to unsuspecting masses.  The virtual quarantines game designers tried to impose didn’t work, in part because the virtual people didn’t follow them, and so entire virtual cities were virtually destroyed.

The experts were fascinated because they’ve have never had a way to realistically simulate how large groups of people will react to an epidemic. But the cure for a real epidemic still won’t be as easy as the virtual one was—they just reprogrammed the computers.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe