Math Says Big Bang Was Big Bounce
By combining General Relativity with quantum physics unknown to Einstein, a Penn State physicist shows the mathematical viability of a collapsing universe before the Big Bang. Steve Mirsky reports.
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
It’s a question that’s been asked by kids, adults and professional physicists—what if anything was there before the Big Bang, the ginormous explosion that marked the beginning of the universe. Or possibly just the current universe? Because one physicist has published a new model that at least gives mathematical credence to the idea that before we were here another universe collapsed. And the Big Bang was more like a Big Bounce.
That’s according to Penn State’s Marin Bojowald, whose paper appeared in the online edition of the journal Nature Physics on July 1st and will be published in the print edition’s August issue.
In Einstein’s General Relativity, the Big Bang is a singularity—zero volume, infinite density and infinitely large energy. Which is kind of annoying mathematically. Bojowald and other physicists combined General Relativity with quantum physics unknown to Einstein. They then get a starting point for this universe with a non-zero volume and a non-infinite energy. So you get valid math results before the point of the Big Bang. Which would have been a contracting universe with space time geometry similar to our own.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
