The 2007 Nobel Prize in Chemistry

Birthday boy Gerhard Ertl wins the 2007 Nobel Prize in chemistry for developing important new methods for investigating chemical reactions that take place on surfaces--catalytic converters and fuel cells depend on such surface chemistry. Steve Mirsky reports. The April 1993 Scientific American "Catalysis on Surfaces" is available at www.sciamdigital.com

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



October 10th is the birthday of Germany’s Gerhard Ertl, who got the best present a scientist can receive—he was awarded the Nobel Prize.  Ertl won the chemistry prize for his development of methods for studying how chemical reactions occur on surfaces.  Understanding surface chemistry means gaining insights into the details of such fundamental processes as the rusting of iron, the workings of cars’ catalystic converters, the function of fuel cells, and the reactions that produce artificial fertilizers.  Surface chemistry even comes into play in studies of the integrity of the ozone layer, because chemical reactions that destroy ozone take place on the surfaces of ice crystals in the stratrosphere.

Ertl developed many of his techniques for studying surface chemistry by investigating the Haber-Bosch reaction.  In that reaction, which takes place on a surface of iron, nitrogen is pulled out of the air and combined with hydrogen to form ammonia, for use in fertilizers.  The process has been used for a century, but Ertl explained it in detail for the first time.  In addition to the Nobel Prize, Ertl’s birthday presents included a lovely walking stick.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe