Two Genes Can Be Better Than One
Gene duplication gives evolution new raw material to work with--and evolutionary biologist Sean Carroll has tracked how a single yeast gene with two functions gave rise to two genes with specialized talents. Steve Mirsky reports.
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Random genetic variation followed by natural selection is the workaday mechanism of evolution. But the occasional big genetic accident can jumpstart the process. University of Wisconsin evolutionary biologist Sean Carroll has a report in the current issue of Nature that looks at gene duplication—which he calls a “source of newness”—in the model organism yeast. Says Carroll, “When you have two copies of a gene, useful mutations can arise that allow one or both genes to explore new functions while preserving the old function. This phenomenon is going on all the time in every living thing.”
In the Nature study, Carroll tracked a piece of the last 100 million years of yeast evolution—what happened following the duplication of a gene involved in the digestion of the sugar galactose. The original gene had two functions related to metabolizing the sugar. Says Carroll, “Natural selection has taken one gene with two functions and sculpted an assembly line with two specialized genes.” And, in this case, two genes are better than one.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
