New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Recipe For Better Coffee

Chemists have identified the key compounds that can make coffee too bitter--and caffeine is not the main culprit. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



We may soon have better coffee through chemistry.  Researchers have identified the key chemicals that can sometimes turn a sublime cup o’ joe into a bitter experience.  The researchers announced their grounds-breaking findings August 21st at the national meeting of the American Chemical Society in Boston.

Studies over the last few years have found some 30 compounds that contribute to coffee bitterness.  Said study leader Thomas Hofmann, “Everybody thinks that caffeine is the main bitter compound in coffee, but that's definitely not the case.”  In fact, he thinks only about 15 percent of coffee’s bite is caffeine-based.

Using the analytical tool chromatography, along with taste-testing, the scientists determined that bitterness is due to two main types of compounds that form during roasting.  These are chlorogenic acid lactones, the major bitterness contributors in light to medium roasts, and phenylindanes, which the lactones turn into upon further cooking, and which account for most of the bitterness in dark roasts.  So perhaps in the future you’ll be ordering a grande half-caf dephenylindanerated caramel moccachino.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe