Recipe For Better Coffee

Chemists have identified the key compounds that can make coffee too bitter--and caffeine is not the main culprit. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



We may soon have better coffee through chemistry.  Researchers have identified the key chemicals that can sometimes turn a sublime cup o’ joe into a bitter experience.  The researchers announced their grounds-breaking findings August 21st at the national meeting of the American Chemical Society in Boston.

Studies over the last few years have found some 30 compounds that contribute to coffee bitterness.  Said study leader Thomas Hofmann, “Everybody thinks that caffeine is the main bitter compound in coffee, but that's definitely not the case.”  In fact, he thinks only about 15 percent of coffee’s bite is caffeine-based.

Using the analytical tool chromatography, along with taste-testing, the scientists determined that bitterness is due to two main types of compounds that form during roasting.  These are chlorogenic acid lactones, the major bitterness contributors in light to medium roasts, and phenylindanes, which the lactones turn into upon further cooking, and which account for most of the bitterness in dark roasts.  So perhaps in the future you’ll be ordering a grande half-caf dephenylindanerated caramel moccachino.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe