Clues To Longshot Life On Mars

A reinterpretation of old Mars lander data leads a researcher to conclude that the tests actually may have found life signs. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


August 24, 2007  Clues To Longshot Life On Mars

The 1976 Mars Viking Landers didn’t find any life on the red planet.  But maybe they weren’t looking right.  Because at least one researcher thinks that a tenth of a percent of the Martian soil tested by the Vikings could actually have had a biological origin.  The Dutch researcher, Joop Houtkooper, presented his ideas on August 24th at the meeting of the European Planetary Science Congress in Potsdam.

One Viking test measured unexplained rises in oxygen and carbon dioxide when it was incubating some soil samples.  Houtkooper conjectures that the incredibly dry and cold surface of Mars might be home to living cells.  Such cells, however, would need to be filled with a mixture of water and hydrogen peroxide, which could stay liquid in the harsh conditions.  And if the Viking landers happened to scoop up any of these strange cells, their breakdown products would be in line with the oxygen and carbon dioxide measured.  The biomass would then represent a tenth of a percent of the Martian soil by weight—which is, interestingly, comparable to levels found in some Antarctic permafrost. 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe