New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

LA's Fault System Actually In Quiet Period

The "urban fault network" under the Los Angeles metropolitan area--which does not include the San Andreas fault--is actually in a period of relative quiet. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



This is going to surprise anybody who’s ever been shaken awake by a quake in southern California.  But geologists say that the Los Angeles basin is actually in a period of low seismic activity and has been for about the last thousand years.  That’s according to research published in the September issue of the journal Geology.  The seismic lull is marked by relatively smaller and fewer earthquakes.  That’s compared with other periods with a lot of rumbling and crumbling.  The period of big seismic activity in the LA basin that ended a thousand years ago lasted about four thousand years.  Long-term data on seismic activity indicates that the calm period lasts about 1500 to 2000 years, which gives LA another 500 to 1000 years off.

Now, the researchers are specifically referring to what’s called the urban fault network, which is under the LA metropolitan area.  It does not include the San Andreas fault, which can still throw the occasional big one around.  About 10 major San Andreas biggies have happened during the current LA basin lull.   Nevertheless, if the current lull ends in the next millennium, LA’s future could be very shaky.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe