Wi-Maxing That Wireless Internet Connection

A wireless technology called Wi-Max has a much bigger range than Wi-Fi, making it possible to supply wireless internet accessibility to large areas with a few base stations. Christopher Intagliata reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Open your laptop in New York City and chances are you’ll find a Wi-Fi hotspot to surf on. Not so in tiny Lone Pine, California, wedged between Death Valley and the Sierra Nevada mountains. Houses are spread out, not stacked, and Wi-Fi sure ain’t a long-distance champ. That’s why a lot of cities abandoned their ambitious plans for universal wireless coverage, explains wireless consultant Robert Morrow in a recent issue of Science.

Morrow writes that Wi-Fi will probably stick around in offices. But he says a different wireless technology called Wi-Max, developed about four years ago, could become the new standard for large areas with scattered users. Wi-Max avoids airwave interference by operating in licensed frequencies. And being licensed means Wi-Max stations can pump up transmitting power, expanding their range to a kilometer or more. That’s 20 times the range of a Wi-Fi station, so an entire city could be covered by a score of Wi-Max base stations. And if tons of users swamp a Wi-Max station, it can redirect them to an uncrowded neighbor. So it looks like no matter how lost in the woods you get, you’ll still be able to check your e-mail.

—Christopher Intagliata

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe