Gene Cloned Responsible For That Beach Smell

Good news for Cosmo Kramer and his plans for a cologne that smells like the beach--scientists have cloned the gene responsible for that special beach scent.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



And now for another episode of Seinfeld science.  On Monday we talked about cooler sports uniforms, one of George Costanza’s crusades.  Well, now it’s Kramer’s idea for a cologne that would make you smell like the beach.  Scientists from the University of East Anglia have just cloned the gene responsible for that briny, fishy scent we associate with the seaside. Andrew Johnston and his colleagues harvested some bacteria from a coastal salt marsh. And they isolated a gene that makes dimethyl sulfide, a gas whose essence is pure eu d’ ocean.

In its natural environment, dimethyl sulfide helps sea birds sniff out a meal—in this case the plankton that produce it. And the compound is generated in such large quantities that it even forms clouds over the ocean that help cool the Earth’s climate.  Although Johnston and his team cloned the gene from a bacterium that thrives in the sea, they also found it in some unexpected places, including microbes that live in the roots of plants. Because these species are so different, he suspects that the bugs got the gene by a process akin to mating. Now, why they would want it is anybody’s guess. Maybe, like Kramer, they just like the smell.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe