Distant Sand May Be Planet's Birth

Sandy particles seen circling around a young binary star system 2,400 light years from us could be an early stage in the formation of a new earth-like planet. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Orbiting around stars far, far away is…sand.  Astronomers have found sandy particles circling a pair of stars about 2400 light years from us.  And they think they might be seeing the very beginnings of the formation of an earth-like planet.  The researchers reported their findings online in the journal Nature.
 
The sandy stuff is orbiting the stars at about the same distance from them as the earth orbits around the sun.  The stars are babies themselves.  They’re called KH-15D and they’re only 3 million years old, compared with our sun’s mature 4.5 billion years. They’re in the constellation Monoceros in the Cone Nebula.  Other studies of particles around distant stars relied on infrared heat data.  But astronomers in this research were able to observe reflected light from the sand itself.
Study coauthor Christopher Johns-Krull, from Rice University said, "Precisely how and when planets form is an open question.  We believe the disk-shaped clouds of dust around newly formed stars condense, forming microscopic grains of sand that eventually go on to become pebbles, boulders and whole planets."

—Steve Mirsky

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe