March 16, 2007

Google Logo Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

CSI's Will Find More Fingerprints With New Technique

By attaching carbon chains to the gold particles used in fingerprint recovery, researchers have made it possible to find more fingerprints at crime scenes.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

March 16, 2007 -- CSI's Will Find More Fingerprints With New Technique   

Criminals often leave fingerprints than law enforcement agents can’t get.  But a new technique, outlined in the journal Chemical Communications, may make many more fingerprints available for recovery and analysis.  

Currently, forensic investigators find fingerprints by coating a surface with a watery suspension of gold nanoparticles and citrate ions.  In that acidy environment, the gold particles stick to positively charged particles in the fingerprint.  A silver ion solution is then used to react with the chemical species left on the print.  The final result is an outline of silver along the fingerprint’s ridges. 

But the problem with this technique is that the gold solution isn’t stable and results are difficult to repeat, which can be a big problem in a trial.  Researchers at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem have stabilized the gold solution by attaching hydrocarbon chains to the gold particles and suspending them in petroleum ether.  The result is like putting a rowdy dog on a leash—the gold particles behave.  A forensics expert for the US Secret Service said the new fingerprint method would greatly improve the recovery of latent prints on evidence.  

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe
CSI's Will Find More Fingerprints With New Technique