Carbon Dioxide Changes Leaf Color Timing

Increased carbon dioxide levels seem to affect the timing of leaf coloration both through global warming and directly chemically. Chelsea Wald reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Depending on where you live, you may still have a few tenacious leaves hanging onto their trees.  And these days, you’re likely to have more of those tenacious leaves.  Measurements in europe have revealed that the color change and falling of the leaves has moved back about one and a half days per decade for the past thirty years.  Spring has also sprung forward, and that’s clearly linked to global warming. But new research suggests that the delayed falls are mostly due to the direct effects of increased carbon dioxide.

Researchers from the University of Southampton in the UK raised poplars in today’s CO2 levels, and in levels predicted for 2050. They found that the 2050 trees used the extra CO2 to make compounds that kept their leaves alive and green longer. Their findings appear in Global Change Biology.  this could be good and bad. The trees will be more productive, but they might not prepare as well for winter.  Either way, this finding means that increasing levels of carbon dioxide can affect trees both indirectly through global warming and directly as a chemical compound.

—Chelsea Wald

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe