Aerobic Exercise Boosts Fitness--For Most
A study in the Journal of Applied Physiology finds that a small percentage of people--identifiable genetically--get little fitness benefit from aerobic exercise. Karen Hopkin reports
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
You’ve probably promised yourself to get off the couch and get some exercise. But before you get up, you might be interested to know that new research suggests that not everyone will benefit from a good aerobic workout. The study appears in the Journal of Applied Physiology.
Many of us jog or swim or hit the gym in an attempt to keep fit, and to help ward off ailments like heart disease and diabetes. And aerobic exercise, which really gets your heart pumping and your blood flowing, is supposed to be the way to go. Because cardiovascular training generally increases what’s called the VO2 max, which is a measure of your ability to get oxygen to your hardworking muscles. The higher your VO2 max, the more fit you are. But in this study, scientists found that rigorous exercise does not boost everyone’s VO2 max. One in five participants improved less than 5 percent.
Their resistance was, in part, genetic—and the researchers were able to identify a set of genes that could predict who would not benefit from time on the Stairmaster. Imagine that tests show that, for you, exercise is a waste of time. Would you be disappointed? Or secretly delighted to get back on the couch?
—Karen Hopkin
[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
