Aerobic Exercise Boosts Fitness--For Most

A study in the Journal of Applied Physiology finds that a small percentage of people--identifiable genetically--get little fitness benefit from aerobic exercise. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


You’ve probably promised yourself to get off the couch and get some exercise. But before you get up, you might be interested to know that new research suggests that not everyone will benefit from a good aerobic workout. The study appears in the Journal of Applied Physiology.

Many of us jog or swim or hit the gym in an attempt to keep fit, and to help ward off ailments like heart disease and diabetes. And aerobic exercise, which really gets your heart pumping and your blood flowing, is supposed to be the way to go. Because cardiovascular training generally increases what’s called the VO2 max, which is a measure of your ability to get oxygen to your hardworking muscles. The higher your VO2 max, the more fit you are. But in this study, scientists found that rigorous exercise does not boost everyone’s VO2 max. One in five participants improved less than 5 percent.

Their resistance was, in part, genetic—and the researchers were able to identify a set of genes that could predict who would not benefit from time on the Stairmaster. Imagine that tests show that, for you, exercise is a waste of time. Would you be disappointed? Or secretly delighted to get back on the couch?

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe