New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Alaska Surface Glacier Melting Means More Glug Glug Glug

The vast majority of ice loss in Alaska glaciers comes from those that sit completely on land—which contributes meltwater to sea level rise. Julia Rosen reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The world’s mountain glaciers contain just 1 percent of all the ice on Earth. But their rapid melting accounts for about a third of recent sea level rise. Most of these glaciers—that start and end on land—shrink away through gradual surface melting. But others, known as tidewater glaciers, flow out into the sea. And by calving off massive icebergs, these glaciers can collapse in the blink of an eye, geologically speaking.

For example, the Columbia Glacier in Alaska’s Chugach Mountains, is a tidewater glacier that once filled a long fjord. It’s retreated 12 miles in just the last 25 years.

Shad O’Neel: “So this tiny little glacier in Alaska is capable of producing 1 percent of the sea level rise budget. And so we know that individual calving glaciers can do crazy things and can act really dramatically and can have this rapid response.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Shad O’Neel, a glaciologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Anchorage and co-author of a new study in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. [C. F. Larsen et al, Surface melt dominates Alaska glacier mass balance]

Scientists thought that tidewater glaciers, because of their unstable behavior, might be an important source of the torrent of meltwater flowing out of Alaska and northwest Canada, where ice has been disappearing at especially alarming rates. But all mountain glaciers, tidewater and otherwise, are notoriously hard to quantify.

So O’Neel and his colleagues undertook the daunting task of assessing the health of every glacier in the region. Using data collected from airplanes, they tracked how the masses of 116 glaciers, making up 41 percent of Alaska’s ice-covered area, changed during two decades. Then they used similarities in the shape, size and location of the remaining 27,000 glaciers to estimate how those changed, too.

The results surprised them: Tidewater glaciers accounted for just 6 percent of the region’s total ice loss. The vast majority came from surface melting of glaciers that sit completely on land.

[O'Neel:] “Your initial response is, 'Wow, this is great, the tidewater glaciers actually aren’t doing that much in Alaska.'”

That sounds like good news, because tidewater glaciers can shed a lot of ice really quickly. But scientists expect the sea-level contributions of tidewater glaciers to wind down in the near future, as they retreat up fjords and onto land.

[O'Neel:] “But the surface melt part isn’t going to decrease.”

Which we now know drives most of the region’s ice loss.

[O'Neel:] “It means that while we might have more certainty about what’s happening, that means we have more certainty that Alaska’s contribution is going to stay the same or grow if climate continues to warm.”

—Julia Rosen

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe