Ancient Europeans Added Zing To Meals

Prehistoric pots provide evidence that Europeans were spicing their food some 6,000 years ago. Cynthia Graber reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Spicy, tangy, sharp, complex—spices add vibrancy to modern meals. Prehistoric cuisine, however, was thought of as, well, bland, based on scientists’ focusing on the energy value of our ancestors’ food: you catch the caribou, you cook the caribou, you eat the caribou.

But bland is now a bygone view. Because researchers have found evidence in prehistoric pots that add spice, literally, to that ancient world. The study is in the journal PLoS ONE. [Hayley Saul et al., Phytoliths in Pottery Reveal the Use of Spice in European Prehistoric Cuisine]

Archaeologists analyzed the remains of cooking pots at three sites in Northern Europe from more than 6000 years ago, during the transition from hunting and gathering to agriculture.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They found what are called phytoliths. These are mineralized bits of plant residue. And some of the phytoliths closely resemble modern-day garlic mustard seeds. Such seeds have little nutritional value, but lend a sharp peppery bite to foods.

Researchers had previously identified aromatic substances in really leftover food—dating back around 5,000 years. Anything earlier than that, though, was tough to discern. But these phytoliths have now provided what the researchers say is the earliest known use of spice in cuisine. Bon appetite!

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe