Ancient Europeans Were Mostly Righties

Marks on fossils indicate that more than 90 percent of humans in Europe a half-million years ago were right-handed. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When it comes to handedness, righties rule. And according to a new study, they have for a long time. Because even half a million years ago, nine out of 10 European humans favored their right hands. The finding appears in the journal Laterality. [David Frayer et al., "More than 500,000 years of right-handedness in Europe"]

Scientists have long wondered where our handedness comes from. All other tool-using primates show no distinct hand preference when it comes to holding the stick or stone.

But have humans always been so heavily right-handed? Some scientists had previously detected a right-hand bias when they looked at the flaking patterns on ancient stone tools.

In this study, researchers turned to the teeth for answers. They analyzed the scratches accidentally left by stone tools on teeth from human fossils collected from a half-million-year-old site in northern Spain and later sites throughout Europe. These asymmetrical marks showed that 93 percent of the individuals sampled tended to stuff things in their mouths from the right-hand side.

Handedness reflects our brain’s bilateral organization, which goes hand-in-hand with our proficiency with language. So our hand preference, and our penchant for speech, may extend deep into our evolutionary past.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe