Another Casualty of War?: The Environment

From lingering pollution to feeding soldiers on bushmeat, war can be tough on the environment. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

 

War is hell. And that hell involves the environment, whether forests, fish or fowl.

There's unexploded ordnance. Fuel spills and fires. Chemical defoliants, polluted water supplies, even the depleted uranium from modern armor-piercing bullets leaching into the land. The bid to build nuclear weapons in recent decades has left a legacy of toxic contamination across the globe, from Rocky Flats, Colorado to Mayak in southern Russia.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Then there are the conflict driven resource curses, like blood diamonds from West Africa or Congo's coltan, a metallic ore that supplies materials for consumer electronics.

War has wrecked whole cities, from the sacking of Troy to the bombing of Hiroshima. And it clears forests, for fuel and to make sure that enemies are not hiding in the bush. Such destruction also decimates flora and fauna. Memorial Day honors fallen military, but war is also hell on everything from civilians to civet cats and cypress trees.

War, on occasion, can also create oases. In places where humans have retreated thanks to ongoing conflict, like the Korean Demilitarized Zone, wildlife can thrive. Because, for the environment, dealing with normal human activity can be a battle.  

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe