July 19, 2012

Apple to Repeat on the EPEAT

Reversing a recent decision, Apple will conform to Electronic Products Environmental Asset Tool standards, or EPEAT, after all. Larry Greenemeier reports

SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Tech

Apple | Spotify | RSS

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

About a week after saying its computers, tablets and smart phones would no longer be designed to meet certain environmentally friendly specifications, Apple has reversed its position. Now they say they will conform to Electronic Products Environmental Asset Tool standards, or EPEAT, after all.

Backed by the Environmental Protection Agency, EPEAT certification means a product passes environmental muster in terms of power consumption, the materials it's made from, recyclability, its packaging and its disposal.

Apple sells 40 different EPEAT-certified products. But it was opting out, ostensibly because the company’s new high-resolution Retina display had not received EPEAT certification.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Then two things happened. First, several government agencies and various schools that usually buy Apple products pointed out that they're allowed to purchase only equipment with the EPEAT seal of approval. Shortly after, Apple's 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display was added to the EPEAT registry.

Apple's flip-flopping is a reminder that there’s a double meaning for so-called "green" technology. To exist, it has to be good for both the environment and to a manufacturer's bottom line.

—Larry Greenemeier

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American