Astronaut Talks about Being in Untethered Hot Spot

Michael Barratt, who spent 199 days on the ISS, told kids at the annual meeting of the AAAS how a spacewalker whose line snaps can still get back to the station. Steve Mirsky reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Astronaut Michael Barratt spent 199 days on the International Space Station in 2009. On February 17th, 2013, he told kids about his time in space as part of the Family Science Days effort at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Boston. Questions from the children covered the basics: eating, sleeping and waste management. Then Barratt got this question from a child, whose mom then elucidated:

Kid: What happens is someone, the line goes off.

Barratt: If the light goes off?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mom: No, no, if you’re at the station and you know how the astronauts are being held together by some kind of line or pipe. What if that snaps?

Barratt: So if you’re out on a spacewalk, you’re very careful about keeping yourself attached. So we always have two ways to attach yourself to the space station. If you come totally free, if you’re wearing the U.S. space suit, you’ve got a little jetpack back there. So you pull a little control and a joystick in front of you, and you can actually fly yourself back to the station. We’ve never had to do that. But believe me, having done a couple of spacewalks, that is on your mind—you don’t want to become a satellite.

—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe