Astronomers Seek Biggest Stars

Several nearby star clusters could harbor incredibly huge stars, with masses of up to 600 suns. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

How big can a star get? Based on observations, astronomers think there's a limit of about 150 times the mass of the sun for the vast majority of stars.  

But a 2010 study turned up an exception—a star of 265 solar masses. Such very massive stars are interesting for more than their mass. These giants could expire in a special kind of explosion triggered by antimatter, known as a pair-instability supernova. They could also collapse to form an intriguing class of midsize black holes.  

Such massive stars may form in dense stellar clusters when multiple young stars collide and merge. Several nearby star clusters could harbor such stars, with masses of up to 600 suns. That’s according to astrophysicists who submitted their study to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. [Tony Pan and Abraham Loeb,"Identifying Stars of Mass >150 Msun from Their Eclipse by a Binary Companion"]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They say that the way to find them is to look for very massive stars locked in binary pairings with another star. A partial eclipse of the larger star by its companion could potentially dim the entire star cluster enough for telescopes to detect it. A long shot, but worth a try. Because it’s always good to find a superstar.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe