Joe Torre and the Psychology of Persuasion

Former Yankee manager Joe Torre made good use of social psychology techniques that were outlined in a February 2001 Scientific American article by Robert Cialdini called The Science of Persuasion, available at www.sciamdigital.com. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



The 12-year tenure of New York Yankees manager Joe Torre ended last week.  At a science conference in 2000, Washington Post baseball writer Tom Boswell discussed Torre’s success in terms of the principles set forth in a book called Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, by Robert Cialdini.  Scientific American went on to commission a February 2001 article by Cialdini, available at sciamdigital.com.  The piece discusses six major persuasion factors, which Torre used to such great effect. 

One is reciprocity—you’re more likely to go out of your way for someone who has done so for you.  The second is consistency—acting consistently shows people you can be trusted.  Third, social validation—get enough people on the same page and the rest will likely follow due to peer pressure.  Fourth is simply likeability—people are more likely to respond to somebody they like.  Fifth is authority—Torre’s quiet dignity and outstanding record as a player himself gave him great authority with players.  And sixth is scarcity—things in limited supply are more desirable.  Which should make the one and only Joe Torre a hot commodity on the baseball market.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe