Fingerprint The Little Weasels

Researchers from the Wildlife Conservation Society and New York State Department of Criminal Justice teamed to develop technology to capture and analyze paw prints from fishers, a species of weasel.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


May 24, 2007  Fingerprint The Little Weasels

The criminal justice system has long kept fingerprints of weasels, the kind who steal cars, rob stores and get sent up the river.  Then there’s the carnivorous mammal called the fisher, a species of weasel that’s once again doing pretty well up the Hudson River, in northern New York, after almost being driven to extinction in the 1930s.  And now researchers can track fishers, by treating them like criminals—they fingerprint them.  Which is quite a trick, since fishers don’t have fingers.  But their little paws do have patterns that are unique to each individual—they’re the only carnivores known to have such discernable prints. 

Where human fingerprints consist of ridges, fisher prints are patterns of dots.  And the dots stymied the computer software used to compare human fingerprints.  So scientists from the Wildlife Conservation Society and other groups teamed with experts from the New York State Department of Criminal Justice to develop a new technique to analyze and compare fisher prints, leading to more accurate population estimates.  The fishers wander into food-baited boxes, leave prints and pop goes the weasel out again.  Which some might say makes it virtually identical to the criminal justice system.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe