Baby-Talking Adults Boost Infant Word Production

The more parents engage in one-on-one baby talk with their infants, the more words the child produced at age two. Allie Wilkinson reports.

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Baby talking]
 
It’s hard to resist. One look at those chubby cheeks, and the next you’re cooing: [man using baby voice] “Who’s a cute little baby?”
 
Now research finds that by using this style of speech to talk to babies, you may be helping their early language development. Adults using so-called baby talk provide particularly good phonetic examples—producing sounds that are clearer, longer and more distinct from each other.
 
Researchers used small digital recorders hidden in the vests of 11- and 14-month old babies to record the infants’ auditory environment. Thirty-second snippets were then analyzed to identify whether the parents used baby talk or regular speech, and whether speech occurred in one-on-one or group settings.
 
The more parents engaged in one-on-one baby talk, the more the baby babbled—which is a precursor to word production—and the more words they produced at age two. The study will appear in the journal Developmental Science. [Ramírez-Esparza, N.,García-Sierra A., & Kuhl, K. P. (under review), Look who is talking: Social variables linked to infants’ speech development.]  
 
So parents, looks like if you chat regularly with your child, you’ll soon be saying, “look who’s talking.”

—Allie Wilkinson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe